- 18 Dec, 2014 14 commits
-
-
Brian Tiger Chow authored
@whyrusleeping may wanna have a look and make sure i didn't screw anything up here BenchmarkInstantaneousAddCat1MB-4 200 10763761 ns/op 97.42 MB/s BenchmarkInstantaneousAddCat2MB-4 panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [signal 0xb code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0xbedd] goroutine 14297 [running]: github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/exchange/bitswap/decision.(*taskQueue).Remove(0xc2087553a0, 0xc2085ef200, 0x22, 0x56f570, 0xc208367a40) /Users/btc/go/src/github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/exchange/bitswap/decision/taskqueue.go:66 +0x82 github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/exchange/bitswap/decision.(*Engine).MessageSent(0xc20871b5c0, 0x56f570, 0xc208367a40, 0x570040, 0xc208753d40, 0x0, 0x0) /Users/btc/go/src/github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/exchange/bitswap/decision/engine.go:177 +0x29e github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/exchange/bitswap.(*bitswap).send(0xc20871b7a0, 0x56f4d8, 0xc208379800, 0x56f570, 0xc208367a40, 0x570040, 0xc208753d40, 0x0, 0x0) /Users/btc/go/src/github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/exchange/bitswap/bitswap.go:352 +0x11c github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/exchange/bitswap.(*bitswap).taskWorker(0xc20871b7a0, 0x56f4d8, 0xc208379800) /Users/btc/go/src/github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/exchange/bitswap/bitswap.go:238 +0x165 created by github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/exchange/bitswap.New /Users/btc/go/src/github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/exchange/bitswap/bitswap.go:66 +0x49e -
Brian Tiger Chow authored
License: MIT Signed-off-by:Brian Tiger Chow <brian@perfmode.com>
-
Brian Tiger Chow authored
License: MIT Signed-off-by: -
Brian Tiger Chow authored
License: MIT Signed-off-by: -
Brian Tiger Chow authored
Before, priority carried two pieces of information. One: priority as defined by remote peer Two: whether task is trashed This assumes the protocol is defined for natural numbers instead of integers. That may not always be the case. Better to leave that assumption outside so this package isn't coupled to the whims of the protocol. The protocol may be changed to allow any integer value to be used. Hopefully by that time, new responsibilties weren't added to the Priority variable. License: MIT Signed-off-by: -
Brian Tiger Chow authored
it seems to make sense since, in each place, the Key and Priority represent the same information b/c you know the saying... "It is better to have 100 functions operate on one data structure than 10 functions on 10 data structures." License: MIT Signed-off-by: -
Brian Tiger Chow authored
License: MIT Signed-off-by: -
Brian Tiger Chow authored
License: MIT Signed-off-by: -
Brian Tiger Chow authored
License: MIT Signed-off-by: -
Brian Tiger Chow authored
the less bitswap has to know about, the easier it'll be for readers. (This now returns Messages.) License: MIT Signed-off-by: -
Brian Tiger Chow authored
for clarity and to avoid errors, define a function License: MIT Signed-off-by: -
Brian Tiger Chow authored
License: MIT Signed-off-by: -
Brian Tiger Chow authored
License: MIT Signed-off-by: -
Jeromy authored
-
