GitLab

ISTM that since we're talking about raw data more so than "objects" in
any kind of Alan-Kay/sending-messages/OOP sort of way, calling it
"struct" is more accurate communication.

(It's also a lot less likely to be confusing when mentioned in the same
context as javascript, since "object" and "map" tend to be collisiony
terms there; whereas "struct" just doensn't really have any prior
associations in that community as far as I know.)
Signed-off-by: Eric Myhre <hash@exultant.us>

All of these struct definitions are horrifying similar in construction
to the same-named definitions in the typesystem package: simply ever
instance of a Type pointer is instead a TypeName string.  Despite being
unattractive, this is correct: since typesystem can have pointers and
cycles, and typedeclaration can't, this is what we end up with.
Signed-off-by: Eric Myhre <hash@exultant.us>